Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC



Restoring Chisels, Turning Gouges and Other Edge Tools

  Winsted/Witherby Chisels - size curiosity by Charlie Driggs  

Despite our pronouncement of last week, this week (post Ernesto's rains) proved that all things go in cycles once again. 

A light seller's market this morning with many empty tables/spots, but roughly 1 table in four offered tools of various types.

Notably, two regular tool sellers were absent.  Now, much of what was offered fell into the 'beat up p*w*r tool' or the 'POS when it was new' categories, but there were quite a few rusty and moderately interesting items to pick through. 

Galoot Steve Kumpf had a booth, where he offered a few dozen woodies and a dozen or so metal bench and block planes, along with chisels, the wood items he offered on list a week or two ago, and what looked to be SWMBO's excess/unwanted yarn supplies, and he was getting quite a bit of action. 

I did return home with a few items, including several nearly-new Winsted/Witherby butt chisels needing handles (courtesy of Steve), breaking the drought.  A sunny, dry, and delightfully temperate morning after yesterday's soaking.

This isn't a huge problem, just a curiosity.  I'm just wondering... Has anyone else noticed this with their late production Witherby?

They were virtually NOS, sans handles, and a good buy price-wise. But I've noticed that the sizes didn't seem quite right... maybe Winsted had a little QC problem, or maybe at least one was meant to be marketed as a metric size.

The smallest one is just a tad under 7mm at 0.27 inches, but the other two measure 27+/64" (~10.8mm) and 13/32 (10.3mm), which doesn't match up well with a common 3/8" or more unusual 7/16" nominal size. 

When I bought them, I actually thought they were three "different" sizes, so the difference between the two larger ones is noticeable, but I don't believe they were intended to be graduated in 64ths. 

I checked another NOS late production Witherby / Winsted paring chisel I picked up a couple of years ago, and that one also measured a bit wide at 24/64ths or 9.7mm vs. a presumably nominal 3/8" size.

In comparison, nearly all other older chisels I have (and a couple of very new) are nearly spot on nominal size unless their edges show signs of being ground, and a few of those old ones are pre-Winsted Witherby.

The steel is good, and for butt chisels I wouldn't think size is often critical. They'll be useful even if the sizes are a bit odd. Handles are mahogany, turned from some cutoffs this morning.

As I said above, just a curiosity .... Anyone?

Charlie Driggs
Newark, DE
August, 2006

Related Info

Woodworker's Guide to Wood Collection only $79.99 at Shop Woodworking

Stanley Chisels



Copyright 2005-2018, wkFineTools.com and Wiktor Kuc.  All Rights Reserved.  Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
No part of the content from this website can be reproduced by any means without specific permission of the publisher.
Valid CSS!